Operations Enfants du Cambodge
(OEC) Conflict of interest Policy
References:
By-law of OEC dated 03 November 2008
Code of Ethical Principles and Conduct dated 12
January 2009
Statute of Staff Association entered in
consideration on 11 February 2009
Cambodian labor law, 1999
Code of Criminal Procedure of the Kingdom of
Cambodia, 2008
1- Purpose
The purpose of this conflict of interest policy is
to strengthen the rule of law, transparency, and
accountability in the organization and to provide
guidance in identifying and handling potential and
actual conflicts of interest involving the
organization. The organization employees are
obligated to avoid and disclose ethical, legal,
financial, or other conflicts of interest involving
the organization, and remove themselves from a
position of decision-making authority with respect
to any conflict situation involving the
organization.
2- Definition
A conflict of interest in NGO is a situation in
which someone in leading or decision making
position, has competing professional or personal
interests. Such competing interests can make it
difficult to fulfill his or her duties impartially.
A conflict of interest exists even if no unethical
or improper act results from it. A conflict of
interest can create an appearance of impropriety
that can undermine confidence in the person,
profession, or organization. A conflict of interests
can also arise when anyone has two duties which
conflict. For example, an employee might have a duty
to faithfully perform their work well as purchasing
manager, and might also have a familial duty to
their sibling who happens to be tendering for the
sale of widgets to the manager's employer. In this
case the employee has a conflict of interests.
In certain relationships, individuals or the general
public place their trust and confidence in someone
to act in their best interests. When an individual
has the responsibility to represent another person,
whether as administrator, executor, a clash between
professional obligations and personal interests
arises if the individual tries to perform that duty
while at the same time trying to achieve personal
gain.
3-Covered persons
This policy applies to the Operations Enfants du
Cambodge’s board director members, management
committee members, executive director, program
coordinator, program and project managers,
assistant-project managers, field officers, admin
manager, and financial manager. Each Covered Person
shall be required to acknowledge, not less than
annually, that he or she has read and is in
compliance with this policy. A Covered Person may
not use his or her position with respect to OEC, or
confidential organization information obtained by
him or her relating to OEC, in order to achieve a
financial or other benefit for himself or herself or
for a third person,
including another nonprofit or charitable
organization. A Covered Person must act in good
faith and in a manner such Covered Person reasonably
believe to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of OEC or, in the case of an employee
benefit plan, the best interests of the participants
or beneficiaries of said plan, as the case may be,
and, with respect to any Proceeding which is
criminal in nature, having had no reasonable cause
to believe such Covered Person’s conduct was
unlawful.
4- Duty to disclosure
(a) In connection with any proposed transaction,
contract, arrangement, policy, program or other
matter being considered by OEC, a Covered Person
shall promptly disclose the existence of any
Potential Direct Conflict that may give rise to a
Conflict of Interest with respect to the proposed
transaction, contract, arrangement, policy, program
or other matter. Such disclosure shall be made to
the management committee, in writing, all relevant
facts relating to the Potential Direct Conflict.
When in doubt, Interested Persons shall disclose
matters as Potential Direct Conflicts.
(b) Potential Perceived Conflicts can be seriously
damaging to the multi-stakeholder community's
confidence in OEC. A Covered Person shall promptly
disclose the existence of any Potential Perceived
Conflict, which shall be treated as equivalent to a
Potential Direct Conflict until such time as the
doubt is removed and the matter is determined after
investigation of all the relevant facts in
accordance with this Conflict of Interest Policy.
When in doubt, Interested Persons shall disclose
matters as Potential Perceived Conflicts and
disclose all relevant facts relating to the
Potential Perceived Conflict to the management
committee.
(c) If any Covered Person has reason to believe that
another Covered Person has a Potential Conflict, the
Covered Person with such belief shall inform the
management committee, including disclosing all
relevant facts relating thereto.
(d) The Interested Person shall provide the
management committee with an updated Statement at
the time any disclosure is made. The disclosure to
the management committee of a Potential Conflict
shall be made promptly.
5- Procedures for Addressing a Conflict of
Interest
(a) If the permanent secretariat (PS) in charge of
watchdog or management committee (MT) members
determines that a Conflict of Interest exists, the
Conflicted Person may make a presentation to the MT
members regarding the Conflict of Interest. After
any such presentation, subject to MT, the Conflicted
Person shall leave the meeting and shall not be
present during any discussion of the Conflict of
Interest.
(b) The Chair of the MT or a majority of the MT
members, shall, if appropriate, appoint the chief of
PS or committee to investigate alternatives or
modifications, as applicable, to the proposed
transaction, contract, arrangement, policy, program
or other matter. If the Conflicted Person is the
Executive Director or MT member, the findings shall
be reported to Board of Directors at the special
Board meeting and prior to the Disinterested
Director approving or adopting, as applicable, the
transaction, contract, arrangement, policy, program
or other matter giving rise to such Conflict of
Interest.
(c) After investigating the proposed transaction,
contract, arrangement, policy, program or other
matter, the MT members with participation of the PS
shall determine whether OEC can obtain with
reasonable efforts a more advantageous transaction,
contract, arrangement, policy, program or other
matter in a manner that would not give rise to or
would alleviate or mitigate a Conflict of Interest.
If the Conflicted Person is the Executive Director
or MT member, such determination shall be reported
to the Board of Directors at the extra-Board meeting
and prior to the Executive Director approving or
adopting, as applicable, the transaction, contract,
arrangement, policy, program or other matter giving
rise to such Conflict of Interest.
(d) If a more advantageous transaction, contract,
arrangement, policy, program or other matter is not
reasonably available to OEC under circumstances not
producing a Conflict of Interest, or the
transaction, contract, arrangement, policy, program
or other matter cannot be modified to alleviate or
mitigate a Conflict of Interest, the MT, and where
the Conflicted Person is the Executive Director or
MT member, the full MT with THE chief of PS shall
determine by a majority vote of the applicable
Disinterested members, whether the transaction,
contract, arrangement, policy, program or other
matter creating the Conflict of Interest is in OEC's
best interest, for its own benefit, and whether it
is fair and reasonable to OEC. In conformity with
those determinations, the disinterested members of
the Committee or MT members, as applicable, shall
make its decision as to whether OEC should enter
into the transaction, contract or arrangement or
approve the policy, program or other matter.